Consider this a bloggy amicus brief.
A California woman has sued Nalgene's manufacturer for downplaying risks of the chemical bisphenol-A. From Reuters:
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Sacramento, accuses Nalge Nunc of continuing to assert that BPA is safe long after dozens of studies linked the substance to hormone disruptions, infertility, early puberty, and cancer.Unless Felix-Lozano or her lawyer know something about Nalgene that the rest of the world doesn't, we think lawsuits like this are toxic to the process of reform.
The lawsuit was brought by Lani Felix-Lozano, who said she bought the company's reusable beverage containers for herself and her two daughters, now ages 11 and 13, for several years.
"They address the issue of BPA in their bottles (on their Web site); they cite the (Food and Drug Administration) stating that they see no problem with it. The problem is they didn't cite the many other studies that show there is a risk and there is a great concern about the issue," attorney Harold Hewell, who represents Felix-Lozano, said.
The lawsuit does not describe any physical ailment suffered by the plaintiffs and seeks unspecified damages. [Link|Via]
Suing a company to force them to do something they have a moral imperative to do is one thing; we have been awaiting developments in the class-action lawsuit against Dr. Brown's, Gerber, Evenflo, Avent, and Playtex filed last year.
But suing a company like Nalgene after it has done that thing, while other companies continue to use a substance that could harm children, is another.
Nalgene hasn't admitted that BPA poses a risk to anyone, let alone the adult population their products primarily serve. Even if company officers did feel this way, they wouldn't dare admit it. But if being an early plastics reformer makes you a target for litigation, this may be a case in which negligence should go unpunished.
We don't support the position Nalgene has taken to this point; they have persisted in claiming that bisphenol-A is entirely safe despite mounting evidence to the contrary. But in deciding to eliminate BPA-containing polycarbonate products from their entire product line, we think they did the right thing at a time when other companies aren't.
At Z Recommends we have worked for a year now to encourage and pressure companies to reduce and eliminate their use of the potentially hazardous chemical based on the precautionary principle and public health considerations. We have done this because we think that getting BPA out of kids' products makes kids safer. For most of this time, pressure has mounted slowly, awareness has grown gradually, and credibility has been gained piece by piece as more experts have weighed in on the issue. Now, things are suddenly happening very quickly. For those just learning about the issue, it may look like companies are quick to respond to public outcry over their products. Trust us: Nothing could be further from the truth.
Nalgene is one of the last companies we thought we'd be defending, and our regular readers probably share our surprise. But think about it. Lawsuits such as this one - unless backed by disclosures of specific improprieties at the accused company (suppressing negative studies, for example, as Johnson & Johnson did with their contraceptive Ortho Evra patch) - slow the process of making the marketplace safer for infants and children, which is both tragic and ironic. Why ironic? Because this response simply reinforces the paternalistic, anti-reform attitude that has made this issue drag on as long as it has: A cynical belief that consumers are so reactionary that they can't be trusted to see their own interests when they're right in front of them.
We don't claim to understand where the law comes down on this sort of issue, and we reserve the right to change our opinion if we find out that Hewell has some interesting cards up his sleeve. But that's how things look from our vantage point.
What do you think? If the Nalgene case became a class-action lawsuit, would you join?
Photo by detritus, shared on Flickr.



16 comments:
What I find interesting is that they offer bottles made out of materials that do not contain BPA and unless someone forced her to buy that specific bottle from the company it should be up to the consumer to know what they are buying. Just because this lady made an unintelligent choice, doesn't mean someone else should have to pay for it. If anything she should go after the person who invented the plastic.
What if she were pregnant, drinking out of those bottles DAILY, thinking that because of the company's pro-environmental stance, the bottles were safe? And say she now has an 8 month old daughter, who she fears she put at risk for early puberty and behavioral problems because of the BPA she knows she ingested while in utero. I don't think a lawsuit in this case would be frivelous, because there could be actual, real damages.
And I certainly don't think it would make her choice unintelligent. Naive maybe.
I certainly see your point. Because Nalgene has not only come to the table with a BPA free product, but pulled all old models, it feels like they are admitting fault. And that just makes them a huge target.
-Alisa
I don't believe pulling old models is an admission of fault, merely a realization they've come to. Nor do I believe that the woman made an unintelligent choice by buying the product. Technology is trial and error - always has been. If Nalgene had prior knowledge of the harm, they wouldn't have made the product. Period. on the other hand, if Ms. lawsuit had known, she likely wouldn't have purchased the product. One can't go around suing everyone. As long as Nalgene does the right thing, I don't believe there to be fault in this case and therefore, no grounds.
wow..I'm amazed. People in this country love to sue others for something that they could have chosen not to do. They love trying to get 'free' money. Why not choose a different water bottle? And the comment about drinking while being pregnant is ridiculous. Do you really thing that that one chemical will actually hurt the fetus? Do you know how many chemicals we eat each day due to pesticides? Do you know how many germs we touch and digest because NOT everyone washes their hands? We are too germaphobic. NO one wants to touch germs.. well, sometimes it's good for you. It actually helps your body learn how to fight off other germs. Why do you think there are so many allergies and unnecessary sickness in children? Because their bodies dont know how to fight off germs!!!! geesh.
Im not sure how to feel about this...but i will be contacting the companies for the products that I have been using like Nalgene to replace them with BPA free products. My husband and I have been using Nalgene, for years,through two pregnancies, what have I done to my kids? This is scary. I've also exposed them to w Avent, Nuby and Dr. Browns and I will not know what and if using these products had an effect on my two kids. But I will be getting rid of everything that contains BPA. Why should I further expose my children to chemicals that have known carcinogens if I am able to? Aren't they exposed to enough already?
I choose these products because they were recommendeded and I choose them because they had a good reputation. I never saw any info that said they were harmful to my kids.
Would I join a class action lawsuit? I dont know. I'd have to know that these people knew that they were poisoning me and my children when they were using BPA in their products.
I was at Sam's today with my mom and there was a pretty salad spinner, made of some kind of acrylic. I told my mom it was probably polycarbonate and likely contained BPA and she shrugged. I said it was being banned in Canada and she said "we're not Canadian."
Sad but true.
Naomi, I love the comment so American.
American is exactly what this lawsuit is, another way for other countries to make fun of us and our crazy ways. We have too many law suits, too many actions. And while it would be very unfortunate if she was preggers and drank from a BPA nalgene all day everyday, but there isn't anything that has been proven to have happend. And unfortunately, in our changing society with science advancements daily there are TONS of things that were found to be "bad" after the fact. I agree with Z Recs on this one, get a life lady!
She should be suing the federal government.
Hello, I'm Canadian and everyone needs to take a deep breath and remain calm. They have not banned the products yet, they have voiced their comments about the research and the stores have volintarily removed the items from the shelves. If you look at other countries and their products they are still standing behind it and saying its safe enough levels of BPA to be confident in their products. (I checked out Tommee Tippee sippy cups my inlaws just sent from Britain)
Personally I bought the ugly skinny gerber bottles for my daughter and they are apparently safe so I shouldn't be worried...but I am because everyone else is in panic mode.
There is so much we could be doing to make the food and drink and environment safer for our kids...sure switch to glass bottles if you want, but what about the tinned food leaching PBA, what about the soda and french fries, hot dogs, balony and non organic foods, and computer/cell phone waves, car fumes they inhale. Since we can't move to the country and become hermits to avoid every possible risk. Just try to make the best choices you can for them and show them you won't panic just because the media is hyped about something. Don't run to make a lawsuit for pete's sake, research it....remember your kids are watching!
@Anonymous #5: We'd be curious to hear if Nalgene offers to send you replacements. Email us at zrecommends (at) gmail (dot) com if you have anything interesting to report. Any other readers addressed this with the company?
I am not anonymous#5, but since Jeremiah McNichols was asking: I did email them about their nalgene water bottles, because I have 5 of them. This is the response I got back =================
Thanks for your interest in our products...
Polycarbonate (#7) bottles do contain BPA. However, before you discard your bottles, please see the following links on the safety of these bottles and also alternative plastics if you choose not to use Polycarbonate:
http://www.nalgene-outdoor.com/technical/bpaInfo.html
http://www.nalgenechoice.com/
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
=======================
In response to the person who said that it's up to the consumer to know what they are buying. Most people I know who used Nalgene bottles didn't know that they contained something that was harmful when they bought or used it. I find it very difficult in the day and age to know what's harmful and what is not.
I did not read this before I bought the Nalgene bottles. The website says BPA free for the bottles I bought but the number on the bottom is 7??? What do I do??
I would strongly advise my daughter to join the suit - she drank out of her Nalgene #7 bottle for years and when she became pregnant in January with her first baby and at 4 weeks started spotting (many many females in our families with no problem pregnancies) - at 6 weeks the obgyn put her on bed rest where she lay drinking water out of her Nalgene bottle - and at 10 weeks lost the baby. Deep down I know it was BPA and I would love to know how many women have had miscarriages that drank out of Nalgene #7 bottles.
to the person who commented "do you really think one chemical will hurt the fetus"- yes, if you read the reports about how it was by accident - when they changed mice's bottles in the labs and the miscarriage rate skyrocketed- do you know how delicate a fetus is? Why do they advise you to stop smoking, eat healthy, don't drink,don't do drugs, etc. BPA isn't a germ- it's a chemical that alters chromosomes and development and information was withheld. They need to do a poll of women who were Nalgene #7 users and had miscarriages. I've known 4 young women in the past year who all used Nalgene #7 and they all miscarried by 14 weeks. As far as germs my kids played in dirt and ponds at our ranch hung out with all the animals and were extremely healthy growing up - up until my 26year old daughter had her miscarriage with no history of it on either side of the family. She drank water out of her Nalgene #7 bottle religiously for years...
9-26-10
here it is 2 years after all this bpa stuff came out......and YES i am one of 'those' women who drank out of nalgene bottles for years! i had several! only thing i drank my water out of while i was pregnant! throughout my whole pregnancy and WEEK LONG hospital stay as i delivered a premature baby! YES i miscarried....should of had twins...but gave birth to one beautiful baby girl....8 weeks
early! started spotting around 1 month pregnant. ultrasound showed what looked like two fetus'. I had severe preclampsia..worst case my doctors had ever seen. I also stored my babys formula in these bottles. by the time my daughter was born (2005) you could find these bottles just about anywhere....I stocked up on the pink color and after making her formula would pour it into these bottles.......mind you......pouring HOT formula into these bottles. fast foward 3 years later all this talk about plastics and contaminates leaching especially when bottles are hot...I am still to this day (2010) one hormonally screwed up young woman....acne, hair falling out..my daughter now age 5 is showing WAY TOO EARLY signs of breast development. would i sue Nalgene....in a heartbeat! was it my 'unintelligent' choice to buy a contaminated plastic product.....NO !!! It was not heard of or even thought about at this stage. reading the words cancer in this article scares me to death......so think again anonymous posters and think about what you would do if it was you that this happened to!
Post a Comment